 |
|
 |

















 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Google was the only business among the nine main sponsors of the Conservative Political Action Conference, co-hosted by the Tea Party. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-03/google-sponsoring-conservative-political-conference-co-hosted-by-tea-party.html The company says it will have a presence at both Republican and Democratic events during this year’s election season, including each party’s convention. Google also had a role in the Iowa caucus last month. The CPAC event was attractive because half the attendees are under 25 and heavy users of technology, Google said yesterday in an e-mailed statement.
“This event is a great opportunity for us to showcase Google.com/elections and tools like Google+, which we hope will be used by every candidate and campaign,” the Mountain View, California-based company said. https://plus.google.com/116535035008265766913/posts/HWKthZcF9Ke Jay Laefer - Feb 12, 2012 - Public Embarrassed and Disgusted
As I've written before, I don't speak for my employer. Now I feel obliged to write: my employer does not speak for me.
Two days ago, I learned that Google had sponsored the 2012 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). During the event, CPAC organized and hosted various panel discussions. Allow me to share a few:
"The Failure of Multiculturalism: How the pursuit of diversity is weakening the American Identity". The panel was sponsored by ProEnglish, and featured a panelist from VDARE. ProEnglish supports making English the only official language in the United States. VDARE is a white nationalist group.
"Why are U.S. taxpayers spending billions to promote abortion and homosexuality worldwide?"
"The Phony Divide Between Fiscal & Social Conservatives: Protecting Marriage as a Case Study". The panel featured Focus on the Family, Phyllis Schlafly, and the National Organization for Marriage (an anti-LGBT group).
Let me be clear: Each of these people and organizations should be free to express their views, no matter how hateful they are. But my employer spent at least $20,000 to be one of only nine top-tier sponsors of CPAC, and that disgusts me. ETA: On the other hand, I just got email from Equality California, a group supporting same-sex marriage, that Google is one of the sponsors of their Equality Awards event. This entry was originally posted at http://firecat.dreamwidth.org/768258.html, where there are comments.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
If you like Kodachrome, photos of women using tools, and/or old US WWII propaganda, check this out. http://pavel-kosenko.livejournal.com/303194.htmlThe photo captions are in English. The introductory text is in Russian, and Google Translate says it goes like this: Я часто хожу на сайт www.shorpy.com вдохновляться цветом Кодахрома. Сайт широко известен своими архивными фотографиями, так что вряд ли он будет для вас открытием. Но мне вот захотелось сделать себе подборку избранного, чтобы под рукой была на одной странице и в хорошем качестве. Может быть вам тоже будет интересно. Все снимки сделаны в 1940-1943 гг. Подписи переводить не стал, потому что плохо умею и боюсь переврать. Но в целом всё итак понятно. Смотрим, впитываем. I often go to the site www.shorpy.com inspired color Kodahroma. The site is widely known for its archival photographs, so it is unlikely he will be opening for you. But now I wanted to make a selection chosen to hand was on the same page and in good quality. Perhaps you too would be interested. All images were made in 1940-1943. Signatures transfer did not, because what is bad and I'm afraid I can misquote. But in general, all so clear. Look, we soak. ETA: maize found an English version here: http://pavelkosenko.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/4x5-kodachromes/This entry was originally posted at http://firecat.dreamwidth.org/767778.html, where there are comments.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |








 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I read a blog called The Beheld. In this post, "Recommended Reading," Autumn Whitefield-Madrano discusses Naomi Wolf's The Beauty Myth and recommends some books that "go beyond" and "work alongside" Wolf's book. One of them is Ways of Seeing by John Berger. Whitefield-Madrano includes the following quote from the book: A woman must continually watch herself. She is almost continually accompanied by her own image of herself. Whilst she is walking across a room or whilst she is weeping at the death of her father, she can scarcely avoid envisaging herself walking or weeping. … And so she comes to consider the surveyor and the surveyed within her as the two constituent yet always distinct elements of her identity as a woman. … Thus she turns herself into an object—and most particularly an object of vision: a sight. Whitefield-Madrano says that she relates to this quote. I don't. Sometimes I dress to look and/or feel a certain way, but once I'm dressed, I don't go around constantly surveying myself. And when I do feel that way, I hate it. So I'm trying to figure out whether this is in fact a part of being a woman or identifying as feminine (and thus my not doing it is part of my being genderqueer) or whether the author maybe doesn't know what he's talking about or is exaggerating what he's talking about (by using terms such as "continually" and "scarcely avoid"). I'd love for people of all genders to comment on this. What is your gender? Do you constantly watch yourself and feel aware of your image of yourself most of the time? Do you think women or people who identify as feminine usually do that? Ways of Seeing was published in 1972. In what ways do you think enforced image self-consciousness for women or people who identify as feminine has changed since then? This entry was originally posted at http://firecat.dreamwidth.org/765199.html, where there are comments.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
This is depressing and I thought about not posting it, but I spent a couple of hours reading these articles and I figured someone might be interested and/or need their blood pressure raised. "I Was a Warehouse Wage Slave" by Mac McClelland describes the stress of working in an etailer warehouse. When I ran across this quote: I suppose this is what they were talking about in the radio ad I heard on the way to work, the one that was paid for by a coalition of local businesses, gently begging citizens to buy from them instead of off the internet and warning about the importance of supporting local shops." I wondered: aren't local shops also stocked via warehouses? Do those warehouse workers get treated better than the ones working for direct etailers? Digging around in some other articles, I found evidence that some warehouse jobs are better than others. The ones that are especially bad are associated with big companies like Amazon and Walmart, which seem to mostly hire temps, set them impossible tasks, and then fire them after a few weeks. "Inside Amazon's Warehouse: Lehigh Valley workers tell of brutal heat, dizzying pace at online retailer"Excerpts: During summer heat waves, Amazon arranged to have paramedics parked in ambulances outside, ready to treat any workers who dehydrated or suffered other forms of heat stress....
Goris, the Allentown resident who worked as a permanent Amazon employee, said high temperatures were handled differently at other warehouses in which he worked. For instance, loading dock doors on opposite sides of those warehouses were left open to let fresh air circulate and reduce the temperature when it got too hot, he said. When Amazon workers asked in meetings why this wasn't done at the Amazon warehouse, managers said the company was worried about theft, Goris said. Just to show that it's not entirely the corporations at fault for this behavior: OSHA does not mandate that work cease when temperatures exceed a specific degree. Instead, the agency gives employers guidelines about what they should do in specific ranges of the heat index. The article explicitly compares Amazon to Walmart. Amazon's competitors are no longer just bookstores. It's now considered a key competitor to Walmart, which has seen its growth slow considerably while Amazon's sales have skyrocketed.
Amazon's founder and CEO, Jeffrey Bezos, keeps climbing the ranks of the world's wealthiest people. Forbes magazine estimated his net worth to be $18.1 billion this year, making him the 30th wealthiest person in the world. That wealth is tied to the value of Amazon stock, which has grown about eightfold to nearly $240 per share over the past five years. This one specifically discusses how arms-length relationships between the warehouse companies and temp agencies contributes to the problem of worker mistreatment: The New Blue Collar: Temporary Work, Lasting Poverty And The American Warehouse by Dave Jamieson. Excerpt: The industry relies so heavily on temp work that many temp agencies actually have offices inside the warehouses themselves. ... ...the splintered workforce among all the temp agencies creates a tremendous obstacle to unionization. Hotels are replacing in-house employees with temps too. "As Hotels Outsource Jobs, Workers Lose Hold On Living Wage" by Dave Jamieson This entry was originally posted at http://firecat.dreamwidth.org/764709.html, where there are comments.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

|
 |