Stef (firecat) wrote,

How not to describe how not to do science

Elsenet, folks were sharing our opinions of an article describing a scientific study of rats, food, and activity:
Warning, before following the link, you might want to turn off image loading in your browser. There's a super obnoxious photograph.
Also, it was reported that the page has pop-up ads. I use an ad blocker so I didn't notice.

So here's what I understand from the article:

Fat rat fed on a diet high in sugar (*stops pressing lever*): "I get a lot of sweets in my diet, so I don't want any more of the sweets I get when I press this lever. Imma go check Facebook."

Scientist: "This rat isn't hungry. That means its brain isn't working right."

Lean rat fed on a diet low in sugar (*keeps pressing lever*): "I've been deprived of sugar for months now. More, more!"

Scientist: "This rat has a good work ethic and strong character."

Benita Matilda (article writer, and nominee for Science Writer Non-sequitur Champion of the Year): "Junk food makes humans hungrier."


Other Scientists: "Hey, there are some studies over here of actual humans! They suggest that humans on low-calorie diets experience cognitive impairments! Anyone want to read these studies?" [second item]

Obesity Researchers (*sticking fingers in ears*): "LA LA LA LA LA"

This entry was originally posted at, where there are comment count unavailable comments. I prefer that you comment on Dreamwidth, but it's also OK to comment here.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded